Prompter glass is not a mirror and it is not a window. Getting a replacement wrong costs you either a readable script or a clean image.
| Best fit | Repairing or upgrading an existing beam-splitter teleprompter rig |
| Typical cost | Low relative to a new rig, and much cheaper than replacing the whole prompter |
| What matters most | Matching the reflection-to-transmission behaviour, not just the dimensions |
| Skip it if | The frame or mount is also damaged, in which case pricing a whole rig is sensible |
A beam-splitter does two jobs at once: it reflects the script from the display below up toward your eyes, and it lets the camera shoot through it with as little degradation as possible. Those two jobs pull in opposite directions. More reflectivity means a brighter script and a dimmer, less clean image; more transmission means the reverse.
That balance is why substituting ordinary glass, acrylic, or a household mirror does not work. A mirror reflects but does not transmit, so the camera sees nothing. Plain glass transmits but reflects too weakly to give a readable script, and untreated sheets often produce a visible double image because both surfaces reflect.
Dimensions matter too, but they are the easy part. Measure the existing pane including the portion held inside the frame, note the thickness, and check how it is retained. The harder question is optical: getting a replacement whose reflection and transmission behaviour matches what the rig was designed around.
| Type | A true beam-splitter, not a mirror and not plain glass |
| Optical balance | Enough reflection for a readable script, enough transmission for a clean image |
| Ghosting | Untreated or unsuitable panes commonly produce a visible double image |
| Dimensions | Measure the full pane including the part hidden inside the frame, plus thickness |
| Handling | Coated surfaces are directional and scratch easily; note which face goes toward the display |
Once new glass is fitted, put text on the display and look for a faint second image — ghosting is the fastest way to spot an unsuitable pane.
Remove it carefully and measure width, height, and thickness, including the edges that sit inside the frame. A pane sized to the visible area alone will be too small to retain.
Manufacturer replacement panes remove the guesswork entirely. If the rig is unbranded, match against the pane you removed rather than guessing from a generic listing.
Many beam-splitters are directional. Note which face pointed toward the display before removal, and install the replacement the same way round.
Set the rig up, put text on the display, and look for a faint second image offset from the first. Ghosting means the pane is wrong for the job, regardless of how well it fits.
Shoot a short test and compare it against footage without the prompter. Look for haze, colour shift, and reduced contrast, all of which indicate a poor-quality pane.
A mirror reflects the script perfectly and lets no image through to the camera. It is the most common improvised replacement and it never works.
Plain glass reflects too little for a readable script and its two surfaces produce a double image. It fits the frame and fails at the job.
Directional coatings behave differently depending on orientation. Note the original orientation before you remove the old pane, not after.
Open the ScriptScroller browser teleprompter, put it where your script would actually sit, and find out which of these problems you really have.
Open Teleprompter